Pain Management Guidelines

The Arizona Board of Medical Examiners
9545 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258


1. Title of the guidance document or subject of the substantive policy statement and the guidance document number or substantive policy statement number by which the document or policy statement is referenced:

Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. (SPS #7)

2. Date of the application of the guidance documents or the date the substantive policy statement was issued and the effective date of the document or policy statement if different from the publication or issuance date:

Originally Published November 1991, Revised May 1999.

3. Summary of the contents of the guidance document or the substantive policy statement:

On September 24, 1997, the Arizona Board of Medical Examiners formally adopted a policy statement entitled "Guidelines for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Chronic Pain." The statement outlines the Board's proactive approach to improving appropriate prescribing for effective pain management, while preventing drug diversion and abuse. Arizona physicians are encouraged to consult the policy statement/guidelines.

The Medical Board recognizes that inappropriate prescribing of controlled substances including the opioids can lead to drug abuse and diversion. Inappropriate prescribing also can lead to ineffective pain management of pain, unnecessary suffering of patients and increased health care costs. The Board recognizes that some physicians do not treat pain properly due to lack of knowledge or concern about pain. Fear of discipline by the Board also may be an impediment to medically appropriate prescribing for pain. This Guideline is intended to encourage effective pain management in Arizona, and to help physicians reach a level of comfort about appropriate prescribing by clarifying the principles of professional practice that are endorsed by the Board.

4. A statement as to whether the guidance document or substantive policy statement is a new document or statement or a revision.


5. The name, address and telephone number of the person to whom questions and comments about the guidance document or substantive policy statement may be directed:

Supervising Medical Consultant
Arizona Board of Medical Examiners
9545 East Doubletree Ranch Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 (480) 551-2700

6. Information about where a person may obtain a copy of the guidance document or the substantive policy statement and the costs for obtaining the document or policy statement:

Available from the Board of Medical Examiners.
Twenty-five cents per page copying cost.



The Board strongly urges physicians to view effective pain management as a high priority in all patients, including children and the elderly. Pain should be assessed and treated promptly, effectively and for as long as pain persists. The medical management of pain should be based on up-to-date knowledge about pain, pain assessment and pain treatment. Pain treatment may involve the use of several drug and nondrug treatment modalities, often in combination. For some types of pain the use of drugs is emphasized and should be pursued vigorously; for other types, the use of drugs is better de-emphasized in favor of other therapeutic modalities. Physicians should have sufficient knowledge or consultation to make such judgements for their patients.

Drugs, in particular the opioid analgesics, are considered the cornerstone of treatment for pain associated with trauma, surgery, medical procedures and cancer. Physicians are referred to the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guidelines as a sound yet flexible approach to the management of these types of pain.

The prescribing of opioid analgesics for other patients with intractable non-cancer pain also may be beneficial, especially when efforts to remove the cause of pain or to treat it with other modalities have been unsuccessful. For the purposes of these guidelines, intractable pain is defined as:

"A pain state in which the cause of the pain cannot be removed or otherwise treated and which in the generally accepted course of medical practice no relief or cure of the cause of the pain is possible or none has been found after reasonable efforts including, but not limited to, evaluation by the attending physician and surgeon and one or more physicians and surgeons specializing in the treatment of the area, system, or organs of the body perceived as the source of the pain."

Therefore, these guidelines are an attempt to communicate to physicians who prescribe opioids for intractable pain not to fear disciplinary action from this Board for prescribing or administering controlled substances in the course of treatment of a person for intractable pain. Also, physicians should use sound clinical judgement, and care for their patients according to the following principles of responsible professional practice:


Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 32-1403(A)(3), the Board may develop and recommend standards governing the profession in Arizona. In developing these guidelines, the Board reviewed 18 guidelines developed by other states and agencies.


A) Pain Assessment

Pain assessment should occur during initial evaluation, after each new report of pain, at appropriate intervals after each pharmacological intervention, and at regular intervals during treatment. Unless a patient is terminally ill and death is imminent (in which case the diagnosis is usually evident and diagnostic evaluations may be of little value and discomforting to the patient), the evaluation should include:

1. Medical history, including the presence of a recognized medical indication for the use of a controlled substances, the intensity and character of pain, and questions regarding substance abuse;

2. Psycho-social assessment, which may include but is not limited to:

a. The patient's understanding of the medical diagnosis, expectations about pain relief and pain management methods, concerns regarding the use of controlled substances, and coping mechanisms for pain;
b. Changes in mood which have occurred secondary to pain (i.e., anxiety, depression); and
c. The meaning of pain to the patient and his/her family.

3. Physical examination, including a neurologic evaluation and examination of the site of pain.

B) Treatment Plan

A treatment plan should be developed for the management of chronic pain and state objectives by which therapeutic success can be evaluated, including:

1. Pain relief;
2. Improved physical functioning;
3. Proposed diagnostic evaluations (i.e., blood tests, radiologic, psychological and social studies such as CAT and bone scans, MRI and neurophysiologic examinations such as electromyography); and
4. Analysis of inclusion and exclusion criteria for opioid management: Inclusion criteria includes a clear diagnosis consistent with symptoms, all reasonable alternative therapies have been explored; the patient is reliable and communicates well, there has been informed consent or a treatment agreement signed; Potential exclusion criteria include a history of chemical dependency, major psychiatric disorder, chaotic social situation, or a planned pregnancy.

C) Informed Consent

The physician should advise the patient, guardian, or designated surrogate of the risks and benefits of the use of controlled substances. The patient should be counseled on the importance of regular visits, the impact of recreational drug use, the number of physicians and pharmacies used for prescriptions, taking medications as prescribed, etc.

D) Ongoing Assessment

The assessment and treatment of chronic pain mandates continuing evaluation, and if necessary, modification and/or discontinuation of opioid therapy. If clinical improvement does not occur, the physician should consider the appropriateness of continued opioid therapy, and consider a trial of alternative pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities.

E) Consultation

The physician should refer patients as necessary for additional evaluation to achieve treatment objectives. Physicians should recognize patients requiring individual attention, in particular, patients whose living situations pose a risk for misuse or diversion of controlled substances. In addition, the prescription of controlled substances to patients with a history of substance abuse requires extra care, monitoring, and documentation, and may also require consultation with an addiction medicine specialist. The physician may also consider the use of physician-patient agreements or contracts that specify the rules for medication use and the consequences of misuse or abuse.

F) Documentation

The physician must maintain adequate, accurate and timely records regarding items A-E from above. "Adequate Records," pursuant to A.R.S. 32-1401(2), "means legible records containing, at a minimum, sufficient information to identify the patient, support the diagnosis, justify the treatment, adequately document the results, indicate advice and cautionary warnings provided to the patient, and provide sufficient information for another practitioner to assume continuity of the patient's care at any point in the treatment." Specific to chronic pain patients, the documentation should include:

1. The medical history and physical examination;
2. Related evaluations and consultations, treatment plan and objectives;
3. Evidence of discussion regarding informed consent;
4. Prescribed medications and treatments;
5. Periodic reviews of treatments and patient response; and
6. Any physician-patient agreements or contracts.


To prescribe controlled substances, physicians must comply with all applicable laws, including the following:

1. Possess a valid current license to practice medicine in the State of Arizona;
2. Possess a valid and current controlled substances Drug Enforcement Administration registration for the schedules being prescribed;
3. If drugs are dispensed from the office, comply with Arizona Revised Statutes 32-1491 et. Seq., and AAC R4-16-201 through R4-16-205.
4. If controlled substances are provided for detoxification, comply with 22 CFR 1306.07(a).

Return to AMB Home Page Next policy
Back to Policy - contents
Originally Published Summer 1990, Revised June 2000.